Menu

Very low accuracy in using pocketphinx_batch and in pocketsphinx_continuous

Help
JCabs
2017-07-03
2017-07-03
  • JCabs

    JCabs - 2017-07-03

    Hello, I'm new in ASR making and I am getting very low accuracy in approximately 12.07% but during training and decoding, I am getting Word Error Rate of 24.7% which is too high also.

    I already tried using bestpath and -kws during pocketsphinx_batch and I get the same result. I am trying to use higher (more) numbers of gaussians to make the Word Error Rate lower and try to get Accuracy higher. By the way, I am making an ASR which recognizes digits only.

    Thank you in advance.

     
    • Nickolay V. Shmyrev

      You need to share your training and test data to get help on this issue.

       
  • JCabs

    JCabs - 2017-07-04

    Thanks a lot for the reply Sir Nickolay, I am not able to share the training and test data. But possibly is there a difference in what is the decoder configuration in training and when using the pocketsphinx_batch?

    Can I possible make the senones higher than 200 but lower than 1000 because I'm using cont. type and have just 8 hours of training data? I would be playing the number of senones and it might take a while. Thank you Nickolay for always giving me solutions and ideas to what must be done to improve and resolve some issues. I look forward for the error rate to just become less than 5% and have its accuracy to be 95% or more.

     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.