From: Clemens <cz...@au...> - 2011-08-07 22:56:06
|
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:47:17 +1200, Ben van Klinken <bva...@gm...> wrote: > Depends on the amount of data size you are talking about and how big > your batches are. > The second option doesn't require you to index twice. You create a > temporary index and you merge it using index.addIndexes. This is > actually a similar process which happens in memory when indexing > anyway. cool will try this. Regards, Clemens |