Re: [Clockwork-developers] Implementation of a decentralized schedule

[Charles B. H. <br...@do...>]

-- On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Joel Loudermilk wrote:

|> 
|> +- On Monday (1/14/2002 10:40) Charles Brian Hill <br...@do...> Wrote-
|> | When you have some time, let's (all) continue to bring up the pros and
|> | cons of both approaches.  The best way for us to determine a course of
|> | action is to fully understand the problems we might encounter when we
|> | implement them.  The more we understand the question, the better the
|> | answer we'll give.
|> 
|> It's been several weeks since we talked about this, but I hope it's not
|> too late for me to put in my two cents. Here's what I see as the advantages
|> of both the centralized and decentralized schedule:
|> 
|> If you see something I missed, please reply. I hope Brian's offer to
|> consolidate and post the list is still good.

OK.  The offer is still good, and I've taken the few ideas I jotted down
when last we discussed this, and added Joel's to that list.  I've also
posted the list at SourceForge:

https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9907&group_id=40038

Actually, Joel's ideas were the first that anyone had sent to me, so if
people would like to think about it some more and send me some more
information, I'll add it to the document.

Enjoy!

--
Charles Brian Hill
br...@do...