how is
(FOREIGN-ADDRESS obj)
better than
(UNSIGNED-FOREIGN-ADDRESS (FOREIGN-ADDRESS-UNSIGNED obj))
???
they appear to be equivalent (except that the former does
not cons up an intermediate uint32 bignum.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
FOREIGN-ADDRESS function patch description
Logged In: YES
user_id=5735
how is
(FOREIGN-ADDRESS obj)
better than
(UNSIGNED-FOREIGN-ADDRESS (FOREIGN-ADDRESS-UNSIGNED obj))
???
they appear to be equivalent (except that the former does
not cons up an intermediate uint32 bignum.