Re: gsoc: first steps, how to do more stuff with LAPs

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Charles Zhang wrote:
> Quick update on the previous example: I cleaned up and added support
> for using more of CLISP's call ops, instead of just punting to the
> computed funcall routine.
> 
> So now the form
> (lambda (x y) (if (= x y) (1+ x) (+ x y)))
> compiles to
> (LOAD 2)
> (PUSH)
> (LOAD 2)
> (PUSH)
> (CALLSR 1 47)

Ah, cool, the FDEFINITION is optimized out! Nice.

Bruno