Re: screen -> module

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

Hi Bruno,

> * Bruno Haible <oe...@py...t> [2018-01-24 19:29:02 +0100]:
>
> The F() macro had made an assumption that the subr_t at runtime and
> the subr_t that contains its initialization data are identical. This
> assumption is no longer generally valid. In fact, the address of a
> SUBR such as REGEXP::REGEXP-FREE is no longer predictable: it depends
> on the number of SUBRs defined by subr.d and of the number of SUBRs
> defined by all prior modules.

I wonder if this has bearing on modules creating new stream types
https://sourceforge.net/p/clisp/feature-requests/37/
https://sourceforge.net/p/clisp/mailman/message/14629441/
and thus a possibility to moving sockets (including secure sockets) to a
module.

Thanks.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1561
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://think-israel.org
https://jihadwatch.org http://honestreporting.com https://ffii.org
There are no answers, only cross references.