From: Bruno H. <br...@cl...> - 2017-08-04 01:17:11
|
Hi Sam, > CLISP test suite mentions XCL a lot. > Moreover, it contains 3 files (readtable, tread, tprint) which are > _only_ used with XCL. > Comments seem to indicate that XCL might be a German implementation from > the 1980-ies. Yes, the clisp/tests/README gives credit to its authors. Some of the bibliography at https://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/~wg/New/MoreTechReports.html is probably related. It is not the same as http://www.cliki.net/XCL . > Do we need it? You can surely remove the #+XCL result cases. Before removing the files readtable.tst tread.tst tprint.tst, I would first try to adapt them to clisp and sbcl (unless the ansi-tests or sacla-tests already contain comprehensive tests of these areas). Remember, the goal is to uncover bugs. Bruno |