Re: HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Hi Daniel,

> We have a lot of code that is only included if HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT is
> defined. Now, C99 requires that type (long long int as well as
> unsigned long long int, both with 64 bits - excluding padding bits of
> course).
> 
> Thus I think we should get rid of those conditionals depending on
> HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT.

I disagree. This would break the ability to compile with MSVC.
Last time I checked (Visual Studio 2015), it did not have 'long long',
only __int64. Has this changed in Visual Studio 2017?

Bruno