Re: Build problem

[<don...@is...>]

Could this be related to the MT problems?
I was thinking that possibly the failure in MT might be due to
choosing a different memory model than the one that was working
before, and that we might find out more by extending your memory
model test to try to build and run MT versions.

Bruno Haible writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > > i have the same problem as Blake (12.3.2017),  with gcc and clang after
 > > make check.
 > > 
 > > *** - handle_fault error2 ! address = 0xb00000050b9 not in
 > > [0xb0000000000,0xb0000001098) !
 > 
 > I'm seeing this as well, and not only on Linux/x86_64.
 > 
 > It's not a "classical" GC-safety bug: the DEBUG_GCSAFETY build does not
 > flag any violation of the GC-safety rules.
 > 
 > We will need additional tooling in order to track down this one.
 > I have some ideas (valdgrind, gcc -fsanitize, and others).
 > If you have other ideas how to isolate this kind of bug, please speak up!
 > 
 > Bruno