Re: clisp: cvs --> hg

[Raymond T. <ray...@er...>]

Sam Steingold wrote:
> away from them (e.g., python switched to hg this spring).
> today, or tomorrow, or next year you WILL have to learn hg or git (probably both).
> I understand that you do not want to start now, and we can talk about 
> postponing the conversion (say, till the fall), but this is inevitable.
> I understand that hg might not be the best tool, some people like git better.
> I am open to discussion about that too (although I am pretty comfortable with 
> hg while the 144 separate executables which comprise git give me creeps).
>
>   
While I'm happy with CVS, if we must change, then let me vote for hg.  I
think I tried to get git for my Mac.  What a disaster.  hg works fine on
my Mac.  hg works fine on my Solaris box too.

Since I (sort of) use hg with xemacs, it's a bonus if clisp also uses hg.

Ray