Re: clisp: cvs --> hg

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

Sam Steingold wrote:
> I would like to convert the clisp cvs repository to hg (mercurial).
> Any objections?

All in all, the response it underwhelming.
Only Bruno (in a private e-mail) supports the transition.
Vladimir, what is your opinion?

Again, if people hate hg, we can contemplate git (with its 130 separate 
executables) or even bzr (which is dog slow and still exists only because it is 
"a GNU project" and RMS is pushing for emacs to be kept in it).
We can also discuss the proper timing (e.g., right after a release?)

Sam.