From: Elliott S. <ell...@gm...> - 2007-11-09 18:39:40
|
On Nov 9, 2007 8:03 AM, Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril <Joe...@t-...> wrote: > Elliot Slaughter wrote: > > Now that I have a working > >version, should I convert the [Installer] script to Lisp? > Please go ahead. > I think it's reasonable to expect that somebody writing "make installer" > has a working clisp (or that "make" will build one). That clisp should > have the I18N and CHARSET packages, to help convert the UTF-8 COPYRIGHT > to ISO-8859-1 (or CP1252?). Maybe also the regex or pcre modules. My script uses the regex module so anyone who tries to build the installer will need regex. Also, I don't think I have any problems with unicode now since I convert the file to rtf format anyways. > I.e. a developer creating a windows distribution of clisp supposedly has > a working clisp, ready to help in generating files, but not necessarily > Ruby, or Python, or Arc, or J. I didn't realize that Arc was available at all. I know that there are applications using it but I as far as I know it is still closed source. Or at least that is what it says on Paul Graham's web page. -- Elliott Slaughter "Any road followed precisely to its end leads precisely nowhere." - Frank Herbert |