Re: documentation strings

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

J=C3=B6rg wrote:
> BTW, how do people here feel about adding more documentation strings to
> stuff from EXT? M-x slime-apropos shows a lot of symbols, but a really
> small number of them have docstrings. When they do, I quite appreciate it.

I think that doc strings with just 1 to 3 lines of text are an obsolete
concept. It doesn't convey enough information. Better use URLs into the
ANSI CL doc or into clisp's impnotes.html. So that SLIME can then mark
them clickable.

Bruno