[clisp-list] Re: standalone executables & command line arguments

[Steven E. H. <se...@pa...>]

Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> writes:

> Nevertheless, I believe it is important that someone who receives a
> clisp-based application can get a clisp repl by merely typing

I would expect it to be the prerogative of the author to make the
implementation decision to use CLISP or some other system, and that
decision here is not meant to be the business of the end-user. Why
must every application created with CLISP also /be/ CLISP?

-- 
Steven E. Harris