From: Lonnie C. <lo...@ou...> - 2007-10-31 17:35:16
|
Greetings All, I have just started experimenting with clisp on my WindowsXP machine with a small number theory problem is HMPQS factoring. The lisp code runs great for reasonably small numbers (ie... 40 - 60 digits) but when I try to put in a test number that is on the order of 150 - 200 digits I get an error: *** - MAKE-ARRAY: dimension 70341185 is not of type '(INTEGER 0 (,ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT)) How can I check the current array dimenstion limit? How can I change the limit to handle the larger arrays needed for my research? Sincerely and have a great day, Lonnie T. Cumberland Email: Lo...@ou... Lon...@ya... Lon...@gm... "Helping to improve our communities, one by one......" |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2007-10-31 18:00:49
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Greetings All, > > I have just started experimenting with clisp on my WindowsXP machine > with a small number theory problem is HMPQS factoring. > > The lisp code runs great for reasonably small numbers (ie... 40 - 60 > digits) but when I try to put in a test number that is on the order of > 150 - 200 digits I get an error: > > *** - MAKE-ARRAY: dimension 70341185 is not of type '(INTEGER 0 > (,ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT)) > > How can I check the current array dimenstion limit? evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT > How can I change the limit to handle the larger arrays needed for my > research? ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT is determined by the CPU type. see http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/array-elts.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHKMLDPp1Qsf2qnMcRAtb0AKCXPMwYSOk2eE7bKsEGBNgPGnYwJACdEOIV EGBPTSrq/r4yYwLpnL9JtyQ= =KJ6N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Lonnie C. <lo...@ou...> - 2007-10-31 18:07:17
|
Thanks for the information. I have to figure out how to "evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT", but from what I can now see, I will have to step up to a 64 bit machine in order to work with larger numbers. Thanks again and have a great day, Lonnie T. Cumberland Email: Lo...@ou... Lon...@ya... Lon...@gm... "Helping to improve our communities, one by one......" On Wed, October 31, 2007 13:00, Sam Steingold wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > >> Greetings All, >> >> >> I have just started experimenting with clisp on my WindowsXP >> machine with a small number theory problem is HMPQS factoring. >> >> The lisp code runs great for reasonably small numbers (ie... 40 - >> 60 >> digits) but when I try to put in a test number that is on the order >> of 150 - 200 digits I get an error: >> >> >> *** - MAKE-ARRAY: dimension 70341185 is not of type '(INTEGER 0 >> (,ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT)) >> >> >> How can I check the current array dimenstion limit? >> > > evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT > >> How can I change the limit to handle the larger arrays needed for >> my research? > > ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT is determined by the CPU type. > see http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/array-elts.html > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > iD8DBQFHKMLDPp1Qsf2qnMcRAtb0AKCXPMwYSOk2eE7bKsEGBNgPGnYwJACdEOIV > EGBPTSrq/r4yYwLpnL9JtyQ= > =KJ6N > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > |
From: Lonnie C. <lo...@ou...> - 2007-10-31 18:12:30
|
Oops..... sorry for the double post.... Sincerely and have a great day, Lonnie T. Cumberland Email: Lo...@ou... Lon...@ya... Lon...@gm... "Helping to improve our communities, one by one......" On Wed, October 31, 2007 13:11, Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Thanks for the information. > > > I have to figure out how to "evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT", but > from what I can now see, I will have to step up to a 64 bit machine in > order to work with larger numbers. > > Thanks again and have a great day, > Lonnie T. Cumberland > > > Email: Lo...@ou... > Lon...@ya... > Lon...@gm... > > > "Helping to improve our communities, one by one......" > > > On Wed, October 31, 2007 13:00, Sam Steingold wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> Lonnie Cumberland wrote: >> >> >>> Greetings All, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have just started experimenting with clisp on my WindowsXP >>> machine with a small number theory problem is HMPQS factoring. >>> >>> The lisp code runs great for reasonably small numbers (ie... 40 - >>> 60 >>> digits) but when I try to put in a test number that is on the >>> order of 150 - 200 digits I get an error: >>> >>> >>> *** - MAKE-ARRAY: dimension 70341185 is not of type '(INTEGER 0 >>> (,ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT)) >>> >>> >>> >>> How can I check the current array dimenstion limit? >>> >>> >> >> evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT >> >>> How can I change the limit to handle the larger arrays needed for >>> my research? >> >> ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT is determined by the CPU type. >> see http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/array-elts.html >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> >> >> iD8DBQFHKMLDPp1Qsf2qnMcRAtb0AKCXPMwYSOk2eE7bKsEGBNgPGnYwJACdEOIV >> EGBPTSrq/r4yYwLpnL9JtyQ= >> =KJ6N >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a > browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > clisp-list mailing list cli...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-list > > |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2007-10-31 18:20:25
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Thanks for the information. welcome > I have to figure out how to "evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT", type ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT (any case) and hit Enter (or Return) and CLISP will print the value. > but from > what I can now see, I will have to step up to a 64 bit machine in > order to work with larger numbers. either that or modify the algorithm. Sam. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHKMdfPp1Qsf2qnMcRAuP3AJ9IBptwiTahLzFoIL5FJlZiCN3PWACgjpis /GxHl61MWhEUM6IDOaPll8c= =2pvS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Lonnie C. <lo...@ou...> - 2007-10-31 18:25:15
|
Don't really know how to modify the algorithm and presume that would require a re-compiling of the Clisp sources which seems like a lot of additional work and large source code programming learning curve. Sincerely and have a great day, Lonnie T. Cumberland Email: Lo...@ou... Lon...@ya... Lon...@gm... "Helping to improve our communities, one by one......" On Wed, October 31, 2007 13:20, Sam Steingold wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > >> Thanks for the information. >> > > welcome > >> I have to figure out how to "evaluate ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT", >> > > type ARRAY-DIMENSION-LIMIT (any case) and hit Enter (or Return) and > CLISP will print the value. > > >> but from what I can now see, I will have to step up to a 64 bit >> machine in order to work with larger numbers. > > either that or modify the algorithm. > > Sam. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > iD8DBQFHKMdfPp1Qsf2qnMcRAuP3AJ9IBptwiTahLzFoIL5FJlZiCN3PWACgjpis > /GxHl61MWhEUM6IDOaPll8c= > =2pvS > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2007-10-31 18:33:51
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Don't really know how to modify the algorithm and presume that would > require a re-compiling of the Clisp sources which seems like a lot of > additional work and large source code programming learning curve. I was talking about _your_ algorithm. you can try to modify it to use smaller arrays. Sam. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHKMqFPp1Qsf2qnMcRAkC4AKCAg+ZqSlY9nCfoFmhRoOu+9sSLbgCfQAiL +IGNbCfQFp0N5RgIjA1DofQ= =RtBL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |