From: <dr...@bf...> - 2006-11-23 17:30:32
|
Samuel Thibault wrote: > Michael D=FCrig, le Thu 23 Nov 2006 14:33:47 +0100, a =E9crit : >> Someone recommended to use non-blocking sockets instead of blocking >> sockets because 'select is typically not used with blocking >> sockets'. >=20 > Mmm, they have a strange notion of select() then. Select is > particularly useful with blocking sockets precisely because it permits > to know whether recv() will block or not... If that's not the case, > it's a bug in the select() implementation. Yes thats what I thought. But it seemed easier for the moment to hack=20 around the bug instead of getting MS to fix this. Michael |