From: <dr...@bf...> - 2006-09-02 12:16:07
|
Brian Paul wrote: >> Maybe a better solution might be to include the >> PFD_GENERIC_ACCELERATED flag instead? According to [2] this flag >> indicates sort of a hybrid driver which might better suit Chromium. > > I was planning on releasing Cr 1.9 today. I'd rather not risk a > last-minute change, OK? No problem. I think the semantics of these flags are not very clear. Moreover I think they are not properly used by the BS Contact VRML/X3D application either. That is, if neither PFD_GENERIC_FORMAT nor PFD_GENERIC_ACCELERATED is set (as it is the case with Chromium) the application should not take this as a reason to abort. I will try to discuss this matter with the folks at Bitmanagement. Michael |