From: Brian P. <bri...@tu...> - 2004-08-11 22:15:18
|
Randy Groves wrote: > We've got a 3x3 display wall with several of the displays driven by > dual-head NVIDIA Quadro FX 2000 cards. 9 displays, 5 PCs, 5 cards. We > can get DMX to run on a configuration where all but one of the displays > is on a dual-head card. DMX has no problem working with the X displays > :0.0 and :0.1 on each of the dual head machines. So far, we have not > succeeded in getting chromium to do the same thing. > > So we modified some of the dual heads to use twinview, so the display is > only :0.0, and chromium will run on top of DMX in this configuration. > But the twinview only seems to work if all the twin views are in the > same configuration - below, rightof, etc. In this case we've set up the > bottom 6 in a 3x1 twinview format (using the 'Below' setting). But > that leaves the remaining 3 displays. We would like to use the > remaining two machines to cover these last three displays, but that > means that one would be a single display, and the remaining two would be > in twinview but with a 'RightOf' setting. > > DMX has no problem with this configuration. But, so far, we haven't > found a way to get chromium to run on this configuration. We are using > modifications of the dmx.conf file. What are the symptoms of Chromium not working? > So - the question is - does chromium support asymmetric display > configurations like the one we'd like to create? Is it just a matter of > getting the right hand-crafted configuration file set up? Or is this > just too much of a burden for chromium's mind? This sort of thing should work. Without knowing more, about the only thing that comes to mind is to change the tilesort's bucket_mode like this: tilesortspu.Conf('bucket_mode', 'Test All Tiles') -Brian |