|
From: Mike H. <mho...@gr...> - 2004-06-17 02:40:51
|
SDP layer choked. FD_ZERO is not the problem.... grumble. The appfaker does like to do recvs which is still concerning to me. -Mike Mike Houston wrote: > According to the code annotations, thanks again Alan!, the calls to > FD_ZERO in the recv functions for both SDP and TCP are quite > expensive. What's odd is that it's the appfaker side that is getting > creamed by the FD_ZERO in recv. What the heck is the appfaker doing > recv's for?! > > -Mike > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer > Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA > REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND > _______________________________________________ > Chromium-dev mailing list > Chr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chromium-dev |