Re: [Chromium-dev] It's the calls to FD_ZERO sucking performance

[Mike H. <mho...@gr...>]

SDP layer choked.  FD_ZERO is not the problem....  grumble.  The 
appfaker does like to do recvs which is still concerning to me.

-Mike

Mike Houston wrote:

> It's packspu_context that calls crNetRecv()...  Apparently, we call 
> packspu_CreateContext repeatedly and do:
>
> while(writeback)
>   crNetRecv();
>
> Here is where time is getting sucked away.  I fear that we probably do 
> something similar in the tilesort spu...
>
> -Mike
>
> Mike Houston wrote:
>
>> According to the code annotations, thanks again Alan!, the calls to 
>> FD_ZERO in the recv functions for both SDP and TCP are quite 
>> expensive.  What's odd is that it's the appfaker side that is getting 
>> creamed by the FD_ZERO in recv.  What the heck is the appfaker doing 
>> recv's for?!
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>> Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
>> Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
>> REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chromium-dev mailing list
>> Chr...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chromium-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
> Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
> REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
> _______________________________________________
> Chromium-dev mailing list
> Chr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chromium-dev