Re: [Chromium-dev] It's the calls to FD_ZERO sucking performance

[Mike H. <mho...@gr...>]

It's packspu_context that calls crNetRecv()...  Apparently, we call 
packspu_CreateContext repeatedly and do:

while(writeback)
   crNetRecv();

Here is where time is getting sucked away.  I fear that we probably do 
something similar in the tilesort spu...

-Mike

Mike Houston wrote:

> According to the code annotations, thanks again Alan!, the calls to 
> FD_ZERO in the recv functions for both SDP and TCP are quite 
> expensive.  What's odd is that it's the appfaker side that is getting 
> creamed by the FD_ZERO in recv.  What the heck is the appfaker doing 
> recv's for?!
>
> -Mike
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
> Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
> REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
> _______________________________________________
> Chromium-dev mailing list
> Chr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chromium-dev