From: Greg H. <hu...@gr...> - 2002-02-28 17:58:03
|
Yes, this sounds great. The packer can be a bottleneck; it's only about 2x faster than our myrinet, so with slightly faster networks the performance is quite sensitive to the packer implementation. -- Some people call me the space cowboy... Some call me the gangster of love... Some people call me... HUMPER (hu...@gr...) > -----Original Message----- > From: chr...@li... > [mailto:chr...@li...]On Behalf Of Sean Ahern > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:04 PM > To: Brian Paul > Cc: chr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Chromium-dev] threadsafety issues > > > On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 04:56 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > > After some experiementation, it looks like we can make thread-safety > > a compile-time option for Chromium, and do it cleanly. > > Very cool. Good job! > > -Sean > > -- > sea...@ll... > > > _______________________________________________ > Chromium-dev mailing list > Chr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chromium-dev > > |