Re: [chlor-develop] CSegment

[<chl...@li...>]

> and consistent. A bounding box at node or segment level is  
> absolutely not needed.

I cannot agree. You need segment bounding boxes for intersection  
tests. Have a look at CPath's containsX: Y: for example. Not to  
mention Segment-segment intersections finding.

> In the third option, it is possible to change the content of a node  
> or segment through moveTo or other methods. The parent path object  
> listens on changes and changes its state accordingly. This  
> complicates things heavily as each child node or segment needs to  
> keep a reference to its parent.

No, that's how it works currently without parent keeping, just by  
means of NSNotification.

I am quite satifised with the current shape of things. What we should  
remove is exposing low level data structes like NSMutableArrays. This  
includes making CPoint and CSegment read/only.

Bye,
Lenny