Re: [Chasm-interop-devel] followup from cca meeting

[Gary K. <ku...@ll...>]

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Gary Kumfert wrote:
[snip]
>
> Can we agree Chasm is entering the endgame of its lifecycle
> and that a gradual drawdown best serves Chasm's customers?
>

No response?  Okay... I try again.  One thing that could be
a big help is autoconf macros to detect if Chasm is really needed.
That way, users who install Chasm could get a warning that
Chasm-like support is already "built in" to the compiler.

Imagine how motivated us Babelers become when all our customers
say "why are you using Chasm, when Chasm itself says its redundant?"

Hint, hint.  ;)

Gary