Re: [Chama-developers] LSLR probs

[Robert F. <fe...@di...>]

<quote who="John A. Turner">
> fe...@di... wrote:
>
>> Does look pretty good.  Is there any way to see the local error in the
>> taylor series reconstruction?
>
> probably - I'll think about that...
>
>> Telluride stuff showed that to be "not
>> good" (tm), and it would be interesting to know if that's a bug, or
>> something different is being measured.
>
> which is definitely something we hoped to achieve with this project -
> finding out what the method should be capable of (modulo various
> assumptions about how results on structured 2D extrapolate to
> unstructured 3D...)

The T stuff has so many unknowns in it, and errors are the most likely
explanation for discrepancy.

> btw, Robt., we've volunteered to do some show and tell at the T team
> mtg. on Thurs. - we have 30 minutes - want to say a few words about
> Chama, or shall I just include it in my intro section?

I'll try to attend the meeting, but why don't you cover the Chama stuff
in your intro.  I did my preliminary song and dance already, so you might
as well use the time to cover you guys' work.

-r