Re: [Chama-developers] LSLR probs

[John A. T. <tu...@la...>]

fe...@di... wrote:

> Does look pretty good.  Is there any way to see the local error in the
> taylor series reconstruction?  

probably - I'll think about that...

> Telluride stuff showed that to be "not
> good" (tm), and it would be interesting to know if that's a bug, or
> something different is being measured.

which is definitely something we hoped to achieve with this project -
finding out what the method should be capable of (modulo various assumptions
about how results on structured 2D extrapolate to unstructured 3D...)

btw, Robt., we've volunteered to do some show and tell at the T team mtg.
on Thurs. - we have 30 minutes - want to say a few words about Chama, or
shall I just include it in my intro section?

-J