Re: [cgiwrap-users] RE: Adding fastcgi support to cgiwrap...

[Tuc <tt...@tt...>]

> 
> It's a real low priority for me, as I figure if you need the extra
> performance that a fastcgi/mod_perl script gets you, you should just have a
> dedicated server process running the scripts directly.
> 
	And to speed them up on THAT server, because of the usual high overhead
of invoking perl, loading perl modules, initializing, connecting to the 
database....etc,etc,etc.  On an UNLOADED server (test), we have CGI's that
take 5.5 seconds to get running.  FastCGI stops that.

		Tuc/TTSG