Re: [Cegcc-devel] Just a frustrated brain dump

[Danny B. <dan...@sc...>]

So that's why you were complaining about long compiles. Oh well, Linux
rules ! Not sure whether the overhead is in Cygwin or in Windows though.

I used SuSE for several years, it's definitely a good choice.

	Danny

On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 01:15 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Just a frustrated brain dump:
>=20
> I think I am switching to linux for cegcc development...
>=20
> Today I built cegcc's gcc at work in 36 minutes.
> On a similar machine, at home, under cygwin, it takes several hours.
> I always knew cygwin had some overhead, but I never thought it
> was *so* much, until I built gcc on linux...
> I've always been a mandrake user, (from 6.0 on), but recently,
> I installed a suse 10.1, and I liked it.
--=20
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info