|
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2009-06-22 19:34:13
|
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:44 -0700, Eric House wrote: > > > I'm not sure how to proceed with getting this fixed upstream. The > > > whole mingw world seems behind on Linux. > > > > Getting a bug fixed in binutils is not hard : just send the fix to the > > right mailing list (bug...@gn...). Doing the diff against their > > CVS (instead of cegcc's SVN) would make their work easier. > > Do you expect to pull from binutils trunk anytime soon? > > Last I checked the tip of mingw didn't build on Linux, and discussions > on their boards suggest it's not a priority for them until the gcc > world settles down. If I can't build, can I submit a patch that I > haven't been able to test even to see if it compiles? (I tried > setting up cygwin to build on XP and got nowhere: I'm a Windows newbie > and don't have time to learn that OS.) I must be overlooking something. What's the mingw you're referring to ? To me it looks like your patch is on binutils. If binutils-CVS works as a part of cegcc, and you can fix an error in it, and test that, then this should do ... Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |