[cedet-semantic] intellisense bug?

[Jamie M. <ma...@cs...>]

Hi,

I really dig the intellisense functionality of semantic.  I want to
try to fix what i think is a bug within
semantic-analyze-possible-completions-default.  I discovered that in
my c code, when i try to complete on the right side of an assignment
like this:

A foo, bar;
foo.member = ba

semantic usually has no completions.  it should complete bar.  it
looks like semantic is correctly parsing the left half of the
assignment and comes up with a type constraint for the right side of
the assignment.  in semantic-analyze-possible-completions-default, the
result of semantic-analyze-type-constraint is contained in
"desired-type."  if the completion tag "bar" is not the same type as
"member" in the above code, it tries to determine if bar might be a
compound type using this code ...

	;; Now anything that is a compound type which could contain
	;; additional things which are of the desired type
 	(setq c (append c (semantic-find-tags-of-compound-type origc)))

The problem is that semantic-find-tags-of-compound-type tries to find
a "members" field and a tag doesn't seem to have a "members" field.  i
replaced this bit of code with the result from a full analysis of the
tag.  it seems to work.  sorry if it's cumbersome and inefficient ...
i'm a beginner at elisp

	(setq c (append c
			(mapcar
			 (function (lambda (x)
				     (if (semantic-tag-type-members
					  (semantic-analyze-tag-type x (oref a scope)))
					 x
				       )
				     )) origc )))


is there a more elegant way to do this?  please point me in the write
direction and i can send a better patch.  Also, I think we should
include the tag if it isn't in the database, because it may or may not
have members.  we may not know, right?

Thanks,

--Jamie