Re: [CEDET-devel] newtrunk?
Brought to you by:
zappo
From: Alex O. <al...@gm...> - 2012-02-05 17:12:46
|
Ok, I will follow this approach... On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Eric M. Ludlam <eri...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > It is better to to check stuff like this in only in "trunk". It will then > get brought into "newtrunk" via a merge. If something is checked into both > independently, it will cause merge problems during the next merge. > > It is ok to check stuff into newtrunk related to things specific to the > newtrunk branch. > > Hopefully this particular situation will not be long lived. > > Eric > > > On 02/04/2012 05:11 PM, Alex Ott wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> One more question on newtrunk - how it's better to make changes to >> CEDET - commit to both branches, or commit to one, and than merge >> together with other patches into newtrunk? I'm asking, because I made >> some changes into documentation in trunk (2 weeks ago) and think, that >> they could be also useful in newtrunk... >> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Alex Ott<al...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Hello all >>> >>> I today switched to newtrunk and noticed that >>> semantic-ia-complete-symbol-menu function doesn't exist anymore. What >>> could be used instead of it? >>> >>> P.S. I also committed 2 small fixes: in semantic/bovine/clang.el - >>> incorrect feature was provided& in contrib/eassist.el we need to >>> >>> require 'cl when compile, otherwise it will fail on load, because `do' >>> isn't available >>> >>> -- >>> With best wishes, Alex Ott >>> http://alexott.net/ >>> Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) >>> Skype: alex.ott >> >> >> >> > -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott |