Re: [CEDET-devel] semantic-tag-prototype-p vs semantic-analyze-tag-prototype-p

[David E. <de...@ra...>]

Eric M. Ludlam writes:
> On 05/17/2011 02:46 AM, David Engster wrote:
>> We have both functions mentioned in the subject and they seem to be
>> identical, so I suggest we get rid of one of them. A quick grep shows
>> that semantic-tag-prototype-p is used more, so should we drop the
>> semantic-analyze-* one?
>
> I think that makes sense.  The log indicates that 
> semantic-tag-prototype-p is a copy of the one in the analyzer.  Probably 
> because I wanted code unrelated to the analyzer to not depend on 
> analyzer functions, but I think the reverse is certainly ok.

OK, I've now removed semantic-analyze-tag-prototype-p and replaced the
few occurrences with semantic-tag-prototype-p.

> Thanks for noticing that.

Well, I learned it the hard way (which is overloading
semantic-tag-prototype-p and wondering why it didn't work ;-) ).

-David