Re: [cecd-devel] [PATCH 1/6] [cecd] answer to <Abort> opcode

[Pete B. <pb...@gm...>]

On 2012.01.03 15:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> I'll apply #6 later on today, mostly because I'm trying to remember why
>> I was doing it the way I did.
>
> Allright, I think this needs some clarification anyway.

Sorry for the delay. I have now pushed a replacement fix for #6 as I 
seem to remember that the reason device_type was used is because I 
didn't have logical address allocation when I coded it, so I used 
device_type as an easy stopgap. Now that logical address allocation is 
done, the logical address should be the one used.

I also pushed a version bump, since it's been a long time, but that is 
pretty much only used to add an internal version tag for quick reference 
- not sure it is actually useful on this project.

Regards,

/Pete