From: Manuel C. <ll...@er...> - 2004-02-10 14:28:45
|
Denis Leroy wrote: > Ok, i'll do what you requested. > > Another option we might want to consider is to spin off gcdmaster - and > gcdmaster only - into its own project. cdrdao would remain as it is > now, with an occasional patch request, and gcdmaster would either rely > on a pre-installed cdrdao or link straight with an included version of > libdao.a. The only advanatage i can think of this scenario would be to > give gcdmaster a little bit more exposure (?). gcdmaster depends on the trackdb library. Perhaps we can make gcdmaster a module (not another project), so we release it separated from cdrdao, but we can still maintain the current cvs structure. I think it is a good thing, but not a priority. -- Manuel Clos ll...@er... http://llanero.eresmas.net |