From: Egon W. <e.w...@sc...> - 2006-05-23 16:07:51
|
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:14, Rajarshi Guha wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:12 +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 14:58, Miguel Rojas Cherto wrote: > > I remember we chatted about this, but the current API looks weird: it > > does not indicate how X and Y data should be passed. > > The original idea was that some modeling routines might not take doubles > (such as when using categorical variables). Right... that was it. > The only constant thing I > could see was that a modeling routine would require X and Y variables. > Thus I didn't specify the exact types of these variables. > > I would say that the current signature is fine - if a specific modeling > package required a stronger type definition, they could subclass IModel > and provide the specific types it wants. > > Does this make sense? How does Weka address this? Egon -- Egon Willighagen http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ |