From: Rajarshi G. <rx...@ps...> - 2006-02-16 17:30:33
|
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 09:46 +0100, Kai Hartmann wrote: > So - please discuss it :) I would suggest making the individual distance measures static methods of the current similarity class. I don't see much point in repeating measures (Tanimoto) or placing related measures in different classes. > Christoph Steinbeck schrieb: > > Kai Hartmann wrote: > >> Good evening, > >> > >> a colleague of mine, Asad, wrote a class with several distance and > >> similarity measures like Tanimoto etc. > >> > >> He asked me to commit it to cdk, but I found a class > >> similarity.Tanimoto. Should I commit anyway? I don't see a use in having > >> a class for each metric. > >> > >> If I commit, Tanimoto will be in two classes. Is this a problem? > > > > My suggestion: Post the class here and let people review it. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <rx...@ps...> <http://jijo.cjb.net> GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE ------------------------------------------------------------------- He who is in love with himself has at least this advantage -- he won't encounter many rivals. -- Georg Lichtenberg, "Aphorisms" |