From: Konrad P. <kon...@po...> - 2005-05-17 10:12:41
|
Dnia 17-05-2005, wto o godzinie 11:24 +0200, Egon Willighagen napisa=B3(a): > On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:19 am, Konrad Piwowarczyk wrote: > > Dnia 17-05-2005, wto o godzinie 10:27 +0200, Egon Willighagen > > Ok, next time I will be more carefull. I am sorry to trouble you. >=20 > No trouble at all. :) > This is a great example why open source is so good. People can try stuf= f, make=20 > suggestion on code improvement, etc.. Your patch does improve code, but= an=20 > API change is something we should do without at the moment ... :) >=20 > And reverting something in CVS is not any trouble other... >=20 > Egon After reading some staff at www I reverted ChemObject and ChemObjectTest to its previous implementation. At last I was forced to learn cvs ;) However I could not test it since tests in qsar module do not even compile:=20 org/openscience/cdk/test/qsar/CPSADescriptorTest.java Konrad --=20 Konrad Piwowarczyk <kon...@po...> |