From: Egon W. <e.w...@sc...> - 2005-04-15 11:29:31
|
On Friday 15 April 2005 01:25 pm, Christoph Steinbeck wrote: > Egon Willighagen wrote: > > some interesting reading material: > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/130796/ > > > > Any using gcj for CDK by any chance? > > The only advantage would be to have a "regular" executable, instead of > a jar file. This might increase usability for Joe User. More importantly: it would make the whole usage of CDK truely open source... now will still require the proprietary Sun JVM. > Speed is not an issue, as is stated in the above article. > So, the advantages are quite limited and considering the hassles > arrising from learning to use this "new way of compiling" and > discovering what is all not supported after two days... I don't know. > > Maybe I'm too negative here :-) Well, I haven't made the transition yet, so ... > PS: I guess, Swing is not supported?!? There are Java bindings for SWT, Gnome, KDE... Only partial Swing, but there are many free alternatives... there is even a SWT-based stand-in for Swing... Egon |