From: Christoph S. <c.s...@un...> - 2003-09-22 12:49:41
|
> I assume (and hope) that this means that the bits are stable so that on= e=20 > can compute the same fingerprint reproducibly regardless of the=20 > operating system or release of the software. It will be very important=20 > to have stable fingerprints for CDK Would consider the current implementation unstable? If yes, why. I agree that the use of more than one bit per structural motive might be=20 advantageous. However, the current one-bit implementation works for me. The current implementation of the CDK fingerprints does its job quite=20 nicely as a pre-step for the substructure search in our NMR database=20 (http://www.nmrshiftdb.org), where is also serves as a similarity=20 search. Admittedly, NMRShiftDB is not large. Any idea on how bits 1, 2, 3, 4... are computed. Do you just take the=20 next numbers from the pseudo-random number generator? That would make no=20 sense, right? Cheers, Chris --=20 Dr. Christoph Steinbeck (e-mail: c.s...@un...) Groupleader Junior Research Group for Applied Bioinformatics Cologne University BioInformatics Center (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de) Z=FClpicher Str. 47, 50674 Cologne Tel: +49(0)221-470-7426 Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786 What is man but that lofty spirit - that sense of enterprise. ... Kirk, "I, Mudd," stardate 4513.3.. |