|
From: Rajarshi G. <raj...@gm...> - 2017-02-20 13:57:35
|
Here's some sample code https://gist.github.com/rajarshi/86389392173191ee15cef7b76d994ae5 and the SD files are available at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xu548wx8brqx9z9/AABloecWNrSXAEcwud7ZSV-Oa?dl=0 Poking around I found our that the neighbor lists for a given atom differ between the aligned and non-aligned cases. On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:59 AM, John Mayfield <joh...@gm...> wrote: > Have you got the molecule/usage? My money is on either order of operations > / Tesselate.java. > > John > > On 20 February 2017 at 02:54, Rajarshi Guha <raj...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Hi, a user pointed out a bug in the CPSA descriptor that is generating >> different results for the same molecule after a rigid alignment. >> >> It turns out that the bug arises due to NumericalSurface giving different >> total surface area values for the molecule before alignment and after >> alignment. >> >> I confirmed that the relative positions of the atoms are identical in the >> two versions of the molecule (pairwise distance matrix is the same to four >> decimal places). >> >> Does anybody have any immediate ideas about why a rigid alignment would >> lead to a difference in the computed surface area? >> >> -- >> Rajarshi Guha | http://blog.rguha.net >> NIH Center for Advancing Translational Science >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Cdk-devel mailing list >> Cdk...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel >> >> > -- Rajarshi Guha | http://blog.rguha.net NIH Center for Advancing Translational Science |