Re: [Cdk-devel] Stereochemistry matching with implicit hydrogens

[John M. <joh...@gm...>]

Nope

On 28 Jan 2014, at 20:10, Egon Willighagen <ego...@gm...> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:06 PM, John May <jo...@eb...> wrote:
>> I’m a bit perplexed by what is correct behaviour and need your input. Consider the 3 structures below, (we’ll say 1, 2 and 3). 1 will correctly match 2 and 2 will correctly not match 3. Currently matching 1 to 3 raises an error. I know the problem but not sure whether to return true or false for the match.
> 
> The matching is not based on CIP rules, is it?
> 
> Egon
> 
> -- 
> Dr E.L. Willighagen
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
> Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
> ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable 
> security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key
> security issues and trends.  Skip the complicated setup - simply import
> a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Cdk-devel mailing list
> Cdk...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel