From: John M. <jo...@eb...> - 2013-10-07 16:01:08
|
Agreed, The molecule change would be possible in a smaller release increment but an entire API restructure would of course warrant 2.0.0. > If you name it "Molecule" it should be clearly stated that it can contain disconnected structures as example and other difference from a "real molecule". Of course and that it is not electrically neutral... J On 7 Oct 2013, at 11:33, Joos Kiener <jo...@su...> wrote: > For me the naming doesn't matter that much if it is clearly defined what the class (object) is and what not. If you name it "Molecule" it should be clearly stated that it can contain disconnected structures as example and other difference from a "real molecule". > > Kind of off-topic but such a major overhaul as discussed in this thread should then be a new major version, eg. 2.0.0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Cdk-devel mailing list > Cdk...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel |