From: Miguel R. C. <mig...@ya...> - 2012-11-02 15:37:44
|
Dear Thomas, Please go ahead. I try to check if the test are running correctly afterwards. Kind regards, Miquel -- Miquel Rojas Chertó http://miquelrojascherto.com Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research || Netherlands Metabolomics Centre m....@la... || mig...@gm... On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Tomas Pluskal <pl...@oi...> wrote: > Hi John, > > > Looks great - will wait for Miguel to give his opinions on the method but on > the implementation side I can answer a few things. > > > Seem like Miguel has no opinion.. I will proceed with creating a new class > for this. > > It might be worth deprecating the existing class and writing a clean > implementation. We have this with SSSR, there is an old deprecated version > and a newer implementation. This will then serve as a) and archive of the > algorithm and b) won't break any existing code that is using it. > > > I like this idea. > > In this case, I could submit the patch also to the 1.4 branch, because the > old code still remains. Is that correct? > > Could you please give me a quick advice, what is the current preferred way > of submitting patches? Should I create a pull request on github? Or create a > ticket on sourceforge? > > Best regards, > > Tomas > > > =============================================== > Tomáš Pluskal > G0 Cell Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate > University > 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan > WWW: https://groups.oist.jp/g0 > TEL: +81-98-966-8684 > Fax: +81-98-966-2890 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Cdk-devel mailing list > Cdk...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel > |