Re: [Cdk-devel] what the CDK really needs...

[Egon W. <ego...@gm...>]

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Thorsten Meinl
<Tho...@un...> wrote:
> In fact I haven't done anything yet. My impression was, that no
> automated Eclipse repository currently exists, but that seemes to be
> wrong.

Ah, apologies for misunderstanding you :)

> So what is there that needs to be done?

Well, it is working OK for Bioclipse. There is code that sets up
source projects which we put in a git repository... that way, you can
clone them, and branch if we need to make patches to get things going
(which we try to upload to the CDK project; there is some backlog
there)...

But if you do not have bug reports, there is nothing really important
to be done.

The repository actually has a pure cdk branch:

https://github.com/bioclipse/org.openscience.cdk/tree/master

(which I really must update to 1.3.8 soon)

but also a branch which has 1.3.x + the CDK-JChemPaint patch:

https://github.com/bioclipse/org.openscience.cdk/tree/cdk-jchempaint

The latter can replace CDK 1.0.x with the new renderer / controller code.

Egon

-- 
Dr E.L. Willighagen
Postdoctoral Researcher
Institutet för miljömedicin
Karolinska Institutet
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers