From: Christoph S. <ste...@eb...> - 2010-05-19 08:08:06
|
As I said in my other email: We may want to impose some "stability" on atom types and then go through subsequent rounds of atomtyping for a molecule until they stabilize. Cheers, Chris On 18/05/2010 23:00, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Mark Rijnbeek <ma...@eb...> wrote: >> Marcus, a Chebi curator said he really wouldn't regard the N in case no >> 3. as being part of an amide group. The main features of the structure >> are the aromatic imidazole ring and the carboxy group. Granted, the >> carboxy group is electron-withdrawing and may tend to disrupt the >> delocalisation of the ring electrons but nevertheless he would still >> regard the system as aromatic. > > Ah, interesting case. I think I'll agree with Marcus here. The carboxy > group is more stable than the matching enol... but ring delocalization > is even more favorable... tautomerism case. > > Good catch. Not easy to detect though... I'll look into it. > > Egon > > -- Dr. Christoph Steinbeck Head of Chemoinformatics and Metabolism European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD UK Phone +44 1223 49 2640; Mobile +44 7826 522319 Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor. ... Ovid, Metamorphoses VII, 20/21 |