Re: [Cdk-devel] Patches for fix change event propagation

[Egon W. <ego...@gm...>]

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Rajarshi Guha <raj...@gm...> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>> I think we need to think about a better way to keep track of
>> patches... the current system does seem to work so well, and relies on
>> manually pinging... then again, that's the job of a journal editor
>> really too... making sure that reviewers reply... but we do not have
>> someone in that position (yet)...
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure how much more a different tracker would help - the
> bottleneck generally seems to be time and number of reviewers.

Agreed. 'a better way' was not so much about a different tracker, but
actually finding people to track the patches... :)

>> After I finalized the fixes for the change event stuff, I'll try to
>> have a look at the PT patches... What was the tracker number again?
>
> 2688082

OK, with the patches for the event passing sent, I'll look at it now...

Egon

-- 
Post-doc @ Uppsala University
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers