|
From: <ant...@ya...> - 2008-08-25 13:20:06
|
No, not really. I only tried the round-tripping with single property per atom/bond/molecule (seeCMLCustomPropertyTest.java) and as soon I saw it does not work, I tried to figure out why. Then I attempted to patch the CMLCoreModule in order to make it parse all custom properties - nearly in the same way you did - but then I decided to not to go in that direction since I was not sure if any custom properties are meant to be handled by the general parser at all. Additionally, the properties I needed to maintain were of rather very specific nature, so I decided to go for the customizer/convention extensions and implemented these. BTW, Egon, could you put a citation link to the article you mention into the Javadocs of CMLCoreModule? Regards, Aleksey --- Nina Jeliazkova <ni...@ac...> schrieb am Mo, 25.8.2008: > Von: Nina Jeliazkova <ni...@ac...> > Betreff: Re: [Cdk-devel] CML roundtrip issue - patch > An: ant...@ya... > CC: "Daniel Zaharevitz" <Zah...@ma...>, "cdkdevel" <cdk...@li...> > Datum: Montag, 25. August 2008, 15:03 > Aleksey, > > I have tested and fixed only atom properties; do you have > tests for others? > > Regards, > Nina > > > > ant...@ya... wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Probably a bit late question, but - what about custom > bond properties and custom molecule properties in a molecule > set or a reaction - are these assigned correctly? > > > > Regards > > > > Aleksey > > > > --- Nina Jeliazkova <ni...@ac...> schrieb am > Mo, 25.8.2008: > > > > > >> Von: Nina Jeliazkova <ni...@ac...> > >> Betreff: Re: [Cdk-devel] CML roundtrip issue - > patch > >> An: "Daniel Zaharevitz" > <Zah...@ma...>, "Nina Jeliazkova" > <ni...@ac...> > >> CC: "cdkdevel" > <cdk...@li...> > >> Datum: Montag, 25. August 2008, 14:02 > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Attached is the patch for the [ 1930029 ] bug. > Sorry, > >> didn't manage to upload > >> it in sourceforge :( > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Nina > >> > >> Daniel Zaharevitz <Zah...@ma...> > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Aug 25, 2008, at 4:19 AM, Nina Jeliazkova > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi Aleksey, all, > >>>> > >>>> I've added a comment and example to > the bug > >>>> > >> 1930029 Aleksey had > >> > >>>> submitted and > >>>> IMHO it should be reopened. > >>>> > >>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? > >>>> > >>>> > >> > func=detail&aid=1930029&group_id=20024&atid=120024 > >> > >>>> The test is attached in this email, since > it > >>>> > >> seems there is no way > >> > >>>> to attach a > >>>> file for a closed bug. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> I have noticed this and also problems with > atom > >>> > >> labels. I started to > >> > >>> look into fixes, but the startup costs > associated with > >>> > >> learning the > >> > >>> details of the parsing slowed me down and I > also got > >>> > >> tied up with our > >> > >>> program's mainframe migration. I do plan > to work > >>> > >> on this some more, > >> > >>> so if anyone makes progress, please make sure > to post > >>> > >> details, leave > >> > >>> comments, etc. I think ultimately CDK needs a > richer > >>> > >> model for a > >> > >>> property, but obviously the first step is to > get the > >>> > >> simple > >> > >>> properties working correctly. > >>> > >>> DanZ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> /******************************************** > >>> Daniel Zaharevitz > >>> Chief, Information Technology Branch > >>> National Cancer Institute > >>> Zah...@ma... > >>> ********************************************/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your > Move > >> Developer's challenge > >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with > Moblin SDK > >> & win great prizes > >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source > event > >> anywhere in the world > >> > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/_______________________________________________ > >> Cdk-devel mailing list > >> Cdk...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-devel > >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen > herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com |