From: Egon W. <ego...@gm...> - 2008-08-22 05:52:35
|
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Christoph Steinbeck <chr...@go...> wrote: > For the other issue with the QM code, I suggest that it is archived and > removed. For what reasons? I really don't like the idea that we remove code just because it is out of fashion... There is *a* *lot* *of* code that has known bugs or even was plain broken, is less well written, and as such much more candidate for removal... I think the community decides what is the scope of the CDK, and it this QM code was accepted before, and then determines the scope of the CDK... Actually, I have zero problems if someone contributes JMopac to the CDK... (though we now have raised standards, which ensure easier maintainability..) Egon -- ---- http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ |