[Cdk-devel] PathTools...

[Egon W. <ego...@gm...>]

Rajarshi,

I agree that PathTools should not be in atomtypes, because it is more
general... for now, I've moved them back into atomtypes, just to get
Nightly compile again.

This is the list with classes currently in atomtypes... and a lot can
be copied into core:

org/openscience/cdk/atomtype/CDKAtomTypeMatcher.java
org/openscience/cdk/tools/manipulator/BondManipulator.java
org/openscience/cdk/graph/PathTools.java
org/openscience/cdk/graph/SpanningTree.java
org/openscience/cdk/graph/matrix/AdjacencyMatrix.java

which will leave in atomtype:

org/openscience/cdk/config/atomtypes/OWLAtomTypeMappingHandler.java
org/openscience/cdk/config/atomtypes/OWLAtomTypeMappingReader.java
org/openscience/cdk/atomtype/mapper/AtomTypeMapper.java
org/openscience/cdk/atomtype/SybylAtomTypeMatcher.java

which more move further down the dependency tree.

Anyone with objections with this?

Egon

-- 
----
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/