From: Rajarshi G. <rg...@in...> - 2007-10-26 18:53:10
|
On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Jiao, Dazhi wrote: >> >>> In the ported test, some of the other failures are because the >>> number >>> used in the assert is not correct. >>> >> >> OK, update them then. >> > It'll be really a waste of time to update because it basically will > end > up with the same unit test as SMARTSSearchTest. Egon, could you revert this class, since as Dazhi points out, fixing the counts will bring it back to the original version ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <rg...@in...> GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE ------------------------------------------------------------------- A motion to adjourn is always in order. |